What do
I even talk about?
I’m
afraid this won’t be a very good post.
The only thing I can really connect this to is the George Zimmerman
trial.
OH
NO! We’re bringing that back!
One
side of the coin argues that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon because he looked
shady.
The other
side argues that Zimmerman fired in self-defense.
I don’t
know if anyone else knew this, but the picture they showed of Trayvon on TV was
from when he was about ten years old.
Few people look shady when they’re ten.
The media and those who provided the picture wanted Trayvon to seem
innocent, whether he was or not.
This is
a problem in the world. The media is
afraid of extending stereotypes, and therefore the news isn’t really news
anymore. At the exact moment they’re
trying to act unbiased, they’re really making it worse. The news ought to tell it like it is. Instead of making Trayvon look like a ten
year old they should have made him look like the young black man he was. People wanted Zimmerman dead because they
felt so bad for the poor boy on the television.
The
story this week focused on a man who people were often afraid of in public
because he was black. The stereotype
does exist, he proves that. But at times
stereotypes are well grounded. They
definitely don’t apply to everyone, but what if he really was dangerous? What if he was dangerous and the woman had
done nothing?
I’m not
going to draw a conclusion or say who I agree with when it comes to the
Zimmerman trial. There would be people
arguing against me either way for no reason.
What is done is done.
Wow, I had no idea that the photo the news showed of Trayvon was from several years earlier. This just proves that the bias discussed in the Staples piece--the stereotypes in the average citizen's heart-- is not the only kind that is alive today; the media is very much at fault for being manipulative.
ReplyDelete